Tag Archive | "Gun Control"

Tags: , ,

Delving into Campus Crime: Hitting crime at it’s roots on Marquette’s urban campus.

Posted on 02 April 2008 by Katelyn Ferral

guncover.jpg

It was the kidnapping and five armed robberies that occurred within the two weeks just prior to Spring Break that made Micaela Robb-McGrath conscious of the realities of crime in District 3.

“Although I thought I was making good choices, I really probably wasn’t making the best choices for my safety,” Robb-McGrath, a sophomore in the College of Communication, said. “The time and circumstances surrounding the incidents, especially the clustering and severity of the crimes showed that I really do need to take proactive steps to be safe on campus.”

With the recent spike in violent crime on campus, the perception of students tends to be that violent crime in the area is increasing.

“I thought crime in the immediate Marquette area was increasing after those events,” Robb-McGrath said.

With nationally recognized student safety programs, Marquette’s Department of Public Safety is looked to as the remedy for crime on campus. Especially in light of the recent violence, DPS has made itself, along with the Milwaukee Police Department available to address concerns and answer questions from the Marquette community, as was seen in a March 10 forum. However, despite the efforts of DPS, some students still have reservations about the level of safety on campus.

“Those crimes were just jarring and shocking,” Julie Knyszek, a sophomore in the College of Arts and Sciences, said. “When they’re separated out you don’t think about it as much as when it all happens in one week.”

District 3 does have higher numbers of violent crime than other areas of Milwaukee, but, according to the MPD Web site, violent crime, including robberies, has actually decreased by 62 percent since 1990.

The expansion of DPS, not only in numbers, but in the continual creation of effective student safety programs also affects crime trends. Since his start with DPS in 1985, Captain Russell Shaw said the department has grown three times its original size.

“As far as personal crime goes, since the late 90s, it has decreased at Marquette,” Shaw said. “With the recent spike in robberies, the perception might be the opposite, but in reality the numbers are lower.”

“CRIMES OF OPPORTUNITY”

In the most recent robbery that occurred over spring break on W. Wisconsin Ave., Shaw said all of the five suspects came from outside of District 3 to commit the crime.

“The majority of violent crime around campus committed is from those outside our area,” Shaw said. “It’s often a crime of opportunity; in a lot of these cases they’re just riding through here.”

As far as increased security measures are concerned, Shaw said the department continues to add more cameras and has cut vacation time to be able to keep a high level of manpower in the department and more officers on the streets.

“We’re creating more overtime and trying to saturate the area as much as we can to have more squads out there,” Shaw said.

In terms of crime, Marquette is a very safe area to be living in, but taking preventative measures along with gaining a broader understanding of violent crime in the area makes a difference in decreasing a student’s chances of being a victim, said Shaw.

“It’s important to look at the big picture outside the patrol area, students never think crime is going to happen to them and it gets frustrating when students don’t take advantage of the safety programs” Shaw said. “A decent amount of students come from rural areas and it takes time to adjust to the urban environment, but students need to be totally aware of their surroundings.”

Despite complaints that DPS is not always upfront about the nature of the severity of campus crimes, Shaw maintains the department does not try to withhold information.

“We’re not trying to hide things when we put information about an incident out there,” Shaw said.

The need for departmental discretion when dealing with crime information is also present in the relationship between MPD and the public. “We weigh the need for people to know about the crimes with the need for a successful resolution,” MPD District 3 Captain James Harpole said.

A new approach to community policing, with a focus on building and fostering relationships between DPS, MPD and residents of the community is becoming an increasingly prevalent and effective way to control crime.

“It was an error of the past to look at community policing as just a program. It is not a program, but a method of operation, focusing on responding to the needs of the community,” Harpole said. “We are working towards becoming proactive instead of reactive like we are now. Our goal is to get rid of the visible signs of disorder and crime. We need to stop people from coming from other areas into District 3 to buy drugs and sex.”

“INTELLIGENCE LED, DATA DRIVEN AND PROACTIVE”

With the limited resources that exist in all communities, learning to balance and work with budgets at the state and local levels is a recurrent challenge of law enforcement at Marquette and in Milwaukee.

“It can be difficult, because preventing crime is resource intensive, and when there are visible signs that something is happening on the street, it adds to that negative perception of the neighborhood,” Jeffrey Altenburg, Marquette alumnus and Director of the Community Based Prosecution Unit for Milwaukee County, said. “Our early priority has been to get a plan in place, where we’re looking for results on violent crime and we’re committed to use info to get specific resources.”

The emphasis on personal relationships, not only between police and the community but also within the department, is the focus of MPD, which “continues to be intelligence led, data driven and proactive,” Altenburg said.

Graduating from Marquette in 1986, Altenburg said that when he was a student, Public Safety was not the advanced policing force it has since become.

“When I was at Marquette, DPS was more like mall security,” Altenburg said. “But the transformation of the department did not happen overnight, you’ll get returns where you put resources in.”

Despite the strides DPS has and continues to make, the realities of an urban environment make crime nearly inevitable.

“I understand crime is not their fault because there’s only so much power in the department and they’re limited by so many factors,” Knyzsek said. “When crime increases they only use what they have available, but I would like MPD to be more available on campus,” Knyszek said.

Although students’ perceptions may be that more cops equal less crime, Harpole said more cops doesn’t necessarily equate to a safer neighborhood.

“For the number of people at Marquette, crime is low,” Harpole said. “Crime happens everywhere, but in Milwaukee we already have this perception that it’s crime filled, but it’s really an anomaly. You can’t condemn the neighborhood and be paralyzed by fear; sometimes we look at such a small snapshot in time when it’s not always accurate.”

As much as crime is stopped by law enforcement, the prosecution of crime plays a pivotal role in diminishing crime in District 3. However, because of budget restrictions and resource limitations, the District Attorney’s office has looked to alternatives outside the criminal justice system, better suited to deal with specific offenses, Altenburg said.

“We’ve been getting smarter about how you bring people into the criminal justice system, you have to preserve limited resources for violent individuals,” Altenburg said. “We’re not soft on crime, we’re tough on crime, but when you lose 20 prosecutors in the DA’s office you have to make tough decisions.”

In addition to understanding what works in the criminal justice system, Altenburg maintains identity is key to cutting crime.

“More neighborhood identity, and relationships and communication improve crime in the community,” Altenburg said.

THE IMPACT OF THE AVENUES WEST ASSOCIATION

As much as law enforcement and prosecutors impact crime in the area, the redevelopment of the business district around Marquette and revitalization of buildings in the community in recent years has played a critical role in violent crime development.

“There really has been a steady, but dramatic downward trend in crime in District 3,” June Moberly, executive director of the Avenues West Association, the local neighborhood revitalization association said. “The investment and reinvestment in businesses and upgrading buildings in the community has had a real impact.”

The Avenues West Association works with businesses in District 3 to improve property management practices and to create a safer environment. The association also works with landlords in the area, encouraging them not to rent to troubled tenants, said Moberly.

Currently the Association is working on infrastructure reinvestments, pedestrian lightings and 27th St. main streets program in the neighborhood. Business and building improvements to the neighborhood has increased property values in the last 13 years.

According to the Avenues West Association’s 2007 Annual Report in comments made by Association President and Marquette Vice President of the Office of Public Affairs Rana Altenburg, “property values within the Avenues West Business Improvement District rose from $46,524,890 in 1993 to $92,953,229 in 2006.

Despite increased real estate values, poverty is still a concern in District 3. “District 3 is home to a more poverty stricken community, and with that higher level of poverty, there tends to be more crime,” Harpole said.

Along with poverty, the Ambassador Hotel, which catered to prostitutes and extensive drug activity in the mid-80s, also played a large role in crime, and contributed to a perception of the community around Marquette as blighted and dangerous.

“Business districts help communities thrive, but when they decline, and there’s that perception that businesses are boarded up, the trend tends to be that homeowners leave and renters come in,” Harpole said.

However, with neighborhood improvements in Avenues West, there continues to be a stronger element of home ownership. As Marquette also purchases property in the area and renovates it, the perception of District 3 improves.

“The investments Marquette has made have been instrumental in improving the area,” Harpole said. “Marquette’s vision for the area has played a huge role in the rebirth of the region with the Ambassador Hotel renovation and other recent developments.”

Part 2
by Robert Fafinski III

For Mike Heim, senior in the College of Arts and Sciences, though, all these facts and figures came crashing down on him one night in late 2006. On an otherwise normal evening at Marquette, Heim, a thrower on the Track team, was walking back from studying at the Al McGuire Center.

“I saw two black guys coming at me with a purpose, I had a moment of indecision-thought ‘what do I do?’-and then it happened… the first guy grabbed me, pulled me onto the grass. I tensed up to fight, and that’s when I saw the other guy pointing a gun at me.”

Heim is not someone a person would normally associate with being the victim of a crime. A thrower on the Track team, Heim’s size and strength are considered some of his greatest assets. He’s 6’6” and weighs 270 pounds. He is a big guy. But now, Heim realizes his size only gave him a false sense of security.
“I have no more illusions that I can’t get picked on because I’m big,” he said in an interview Monday.

After the initial shock wore off and Heim realized that he was being mugged, he attempted to look at the men for distinguishing features, something he hoped could be used for subsequent police efforts. That’s when the scariest thing happened.

“After the confusion wore off, I started to look up because I may have had to identify the guys. That’s when the guy thrust up the gun at my face and said, ‘Don’t f—— look at me or I’ll shoot your ass.”

It’s at this point that looking back Heim is finally actually able to find a little humor in the incident.
“When he said that, I stuck my chin waaay down on my chest I was so scared I did whatever they said.”

When the men had taken all of Heim’s personal property, they told him to walk back the way he had come while they mad their getaway.

“When they had everything, they said ‘turn back and walk back the way you came- don’t turn around or I’ll shoot you.’ And I believed them.”
Heim then stumbled upon two unsuspecting Marquette women who let him into their apartment and called DPS. Heim was physically safe, but the damage to his psyche was just setting in.

MU RESPONSE “AWESOME”

Marquette University Public Safety acted very professionally and caring, according to Heim. Despite his shaken state, the first officer on the scene was very helpful- suggesting counseling and even giving Heim a pamphlet about identity theft.
“I thought [DPS was] awesome. They were patient because I was speaking a mile a minute. The officer was really nice. He talked to me about victim counseling. He also told me, ‘this is a traumatic crime. If at any point in the future you feel nervous or need someone to talk to, just pick up a Blue Light Phone and one of our officers will just pick you up and drive you home.’”
Heim did, in fact, utilize the victim counseling services offered by Marquette. Often after a traumatic crime, the victim will not feel comfortable talking about his feelings to someone who has not had a shared experience. So Heim was a little apprehensive about going to counseling.

But, he said, “It did help. I mean, those people are trained to understand. It gave me something to bounce my frustrations off of. It was someone to talk to and [Marquette University] really prepared a lot of support for me.”
What was not “awesome” for Heim was the criminal outcome. The two men were never found. They used his debit card a few times over the next hour or so, but then the trail went cold.

MENTAL CONCERNS

When the DPS officers arrived at the apartment after the mugging, Heim was finally safe. The muggers could not get to him. But just because he was physically safe did not mean the damage was done.

It is not easy for Heim to talk about it, but that the mugging really does stay with him on a daily basis while on Marquette’s campus.

“I’m still having trouble with it…It really changes your perception of things,” he said. “I’d hear a noise that usually wouldn’t startle me and I’d jump right out of my seat.”

After the robbery, Heim took steps to avoid being the victim of another traumatic crime. He was much more cognizant of people around him on campus. He used Marquette’s LIMO program. But this year, his vigilance began to wane. But with the recent wave of criminal activity on campus, Heim has largely returned to his vigilant ways.

“You know, I try not to walk home by myself anymore, especially realizing this crime spree recently. I take LIMOS and get rides after the sun goes down,” he said. “Whenever I walk anywhere off of Wisconsin Avenue, my head’s on a swivel.”
In all, Heim says he lost a little over $300 worth of property. Not bad considering he had a pistol pointed at his face for a few minutes. But even worse than the monetary loss for Heim is the loss of innocence.

“The worst thing they did is take away my sense of security,” he said. “Obviously, I wasn’t comfortable here at Marquette.”

Popularity: 25% [?]

Comments (1)

Tags: , ,

Conceal-carry could’ve ended tragedy

Posted on 25 April 2007 by Robert Fafinski

This is a tough column to write because the nationwide emotional wound is not yet close to healing. But it must be written. In the wake of the Virginia Tech shooting by student Cho Seung-Hui, the best thing we can do is look forward, ask tough questions and try to implement policies that could help to avoid similar catastrophes.

The Second Amendment says that “the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” That seems simple and clear enough – citizens are allowed to own and carry weapons. Currently 48 states have laws that allow for some degree of concealed-carry, meaning it is legal to carry a handgun in public on one’s person. Illinois and Wisconsin are the only two states that have no provision allowing people to have personal protection in the form of a gun in public.

In January 2006, Wisconsin Governor Doyle vetoed a bill passed by the Wisconsin state legislature that would have allowed for people over the age of 21 to carry concealed weapons upon completion of a safety course and contingent upon the fact that they had never been convicted of a felony or of a few enumerated misdemeanors like, for example, domestic violence.

Until last week I believed that Doyle’s veto ignored a constitutional guarantee, but I never really saw the practical ramifications. I often told friends that despite Milwaukee’s high murder rates, we had nothing to worry about since the vast majority of murders are drug or gang-related in which both the shooter and the victim are less than admirable characters and usually acquaintances.

Yet, the problem of random crimes does exist and unfortunately, people like Cho are part of our society. It’s a sad reality that a similar situation is technically within the realm of possibility at Marquette. Most of Marquette’s classrooms only have one exit, so it’d be easy to trap a classroom full of students. Unarmed, students are without any form of recourse and may be easy prey to an assailant.

There will always be troubled people in the world. That’s a fact. But some people are so troubled – maybe even crazy – that the only thing that can possibly stop them from killing is the idea that they may end up looking down the barrel of a gun..

While the state of Virginia allows concealed weapons to be carried by its citizens, unfortunately Virginia Tech does not. In fact, last year at Virginia Tech a licensed carrier got into trouble with school administrators for having his handgun with him in class. Could the shooter’s rampage been shortened by one law abiding citizen with steady aim and a Smith & Wesson? I believe many lives could’ve been saved and that it’s too bad no Virginia Tech student or faculty member was allowed to have a weapon on them that day.

I’m not saying the perfect answer is to arm students and professors. In a perfect world, we’d need no guns at all outside of hunting and recreational shooting. But let’s be serious and honest: that perfect world is not here. Each and every day in the U.S. criminals are stopped in the act of a crime by law abiding citizens with guns. It’s altogether too ignorant and simplistic to say, “Guns are bad so we should outlaw them.” Even if we outlawed them, criminals would still break the law and get guns. They’re criminals after all and breaking the law is what they do.

After a tragedy, there are tough questions to be asked and many viewpoints to be discussed. That’s a good thing. I know that this event has led me to think seriously about applying for a concealed-carry permit in my home state of Minnesota. If I do get the permit, I wouldn’t carry a handgun with me at all times in Minnesota, but there’d be times I would. If you are contemplating committing a serious crime in Minnesota, you better hope that someone like me is not around. Yet, thanks to Governor Doyle, while in Wisconsin we remain deprived of this power to defend ourselves, our loved ones and, God forbid, our classmates…

Popularity: 8% [?]

Comments (1)

Tags: ,

YES – Lifting gun control regulations would reduce crime, empower citizens

Posted on 27 September 2006 by Sarah Kirby

According to the Wisconsin Anti-Violence Effort (WAVE) Web site, 400 people in Wisconsin are killed each year by guns. With annual firearm deaths exceeding 30,000 nationwide, families and neighborhoods everywhere are devastated daily by this violence.

Although these figures are daunting, WAVE itself may scare me more.

According to the Wisconsin Anti-Violence Effort (WAVE) Web site, 400 people in Wisconsin are killed each year by guns. With annual firearm deaths exceeding 30,000 nationwide, families and neighborhoods everywhere are devastated daily by this violence.

Although these figures are daunting, WAVE itself may scare me more.
Continue Reading

Popularity: 8% [?]

Comments (0)

Tags: ,

NO – Justice would be subjective if citizens allowed to own guns

Posted on 27 September 2006 by Mike Rudzinski

John Wayne is still my hero. From the early days of my youth, I began idolizing the Duke and his roles in The Searchers and The Quiet Man. And just like Sgt. Stryker in Sands of Iwo Jima, I wanted a gun. I wanted to hold a real Thompson Submachine gun – my favorite gun – and be a hero, just like the Duke.

But now, as a conscientious objector to private ownership of automatic weapons, I have a hard time justifying myself owning or even shooting a submachine gun. But it’s tempting, it’s nostalgic, and it’s my right – so why shouldn’t I?

Oddly enough, a similar reasoning goes for conceal and carry laws for firearms. It would make sense that we should defend ourselves, and self-defense is a God-given right every human has, so why not?

Because public safety isn’t a personal issue, it needs to be governed. The principles of conceal and carry are correct: I should be able to defend myself and those around me from threats. But the conclusion that we have to do it ourselves is not. Americans can’t take an issue like self-defense into their own hands, otherwise it becomes entirely subjective. Once I consider myself justified in having a weapon on me at all times, then comes the ultimate question: when do I whip out the heat I’m packing?

If each person decides for his or herself which situation warrants pointing his or her piece, then where are the standards? Therein lays the gray matter of this argument. If diversity legislation has taught us anything, it’s been that everyone comes from a different background, and we all have a different set of morals. Most of the people reading this newspaper are probably trustworthy with a firearm, but am I? How do you know?

You don’t, and that’s the point. The odds of conceal and carry laws encouraging more violence or a great, Dirty Harry-like shootout in Milwaukee are pretty slim. There’s even a chance that crime may dip temporarily, as it did in Florida when conceal and carry laws were first passed. Quite possibly, the opposition may be right and conceal and carry laws may make Wisconsin a safer place. At least for now.

But that wouldn’t change the fact that we would all be at the mercy of individual justice. Handing citizens guns for their own protection is like giving them a gavel, and I am not going to hand my right to justice over to a bunch of Packer Fans. Guns empower people; when you hand someone a gun, you’re giving them a weapon that was designed to kill. You’re giving them power over other human lives. It is the role of the government to determine and deal out justice, not the individual. Courts decide the law and what is just, police enforce it and that keeps justice objective.

Without objective justice, we’re placing our rights, our privileges and our lives in the hands of other citizens – citizens packing heat. Police lose their purpose when we reach that point, and we begin to place this country on a system of vigilante justice. As much as I’d like to have a Thompson around for my own protection, in the end it really doesn’t make any sense when I already live in a country with laws and a police force to protect me. In The Green Berets, the Duke’s last movie, “due process is a bullet.” But as for me and shooting my Thompson, I think I’ll have to wait.

Popularity: 6% [?]

Comments (0)

Advertise Here


Photos from our Flickr stream

See all photos

The Warrior: Marquette's Independent News Source on Facebook
Advertise Here