Tag Archive | "TV"

Tags: ,

Barackumentary: 30 minutes of successful propaganda

Posted on 06 November 2008 by Remington Tonar

Note: this piece was prepared before November 4, and as such does not reflect the results of the 2008 presidential election.

On October 29 the Obama campaign unleashed a 30 minute documentary-style advertisement that aired during prime time on many of the major networks. The special was a huge success with an estimated 30 million people tuning in to watch it, scoring a Nielsen rating of 22 – meaning that 22 percent of all households with televisions in the nation watched the program.

The program itself begins with a short introduction by Obama, accompanied by a beautiful scene of golden wheat blowing in the wind and a soundtrack that is reminiscent of the score that Randy Edelman composed for the movie Gettysburg.

After the brief introduction Obama introduces the first of many families that are struggling to afford healthcare and pay their bills, desperately concerned about “making ends meet.” Following this touching characterization of the average American family, Mr. Obama blithely pins the blame for the current economic crisis on President Bush and “eight years of failed policies.” This point is used as a transition into a short segment on Barack Obama’s economic policies, none of which are actually enumerated, but simply alluded to in an amorphous way meant to appeal to the emotions of the viewer.

It isn’t until about 12 minutes into the program that the viewer is actually given specific numbers and information regarding Obama’s policy proposals. Occasionally, notable supporters appear on screen to share their fervor for these proposals, including Eric Schmidt, the CEO of Google.

The program continues to profile American families and workers that bring forth numerous grievances, complaining about the economy, taxes, cost of living, of healthcare and unemployment. One cannot but help feeling sympathy for these families, which is precisely the reaction that the entire advertisement seeks to elicit.

The program touches on education, using Obama’s own modest childhood to help bolster his credibility. Following this, about 20 minutes into the program, Obama begins to talk about his personal life, as the show displays clips from the campaign trail that highlight Obama’s vision for America’s youth.

Michelle Obama makes an appearance and talks shortly about her husband, and is followed by a string of prominent Democratic politicians that similarly praise Obama’s credentials and political prowess. As the Obamamentary passes the 20 minute mark the tone shifts to convey Obama’s hopes for America, very broadly presenting the policies not previously mentioned in the program, like Obama’s plans for the military. Shortly after these remarks the program begins to conclude, as the inspirational music returns with Obama speaking passionately in the foreground.

From a cinematic perspective, the Obamamentary was well produced. The entire concept of having a half an hour primetime special is unique and is certainly a testament to the originality and ingenuity that the Obama campaign has brought to this election. However, from a political perspective, one must hope that an Obama presidency would be more concrete than the thirty minutes of emotional appeals that characterized this advertisement.

For some this program was undoubtedly inspirational, and for others most certainly entertaining in a sarcastic sort of way. Either way, millions of people tuned in last week and millions more have viewed the corresponding YouTube video. So, whether the program influenced votes or not, it has certainly earned the right to be called a success.

Popularity: 14% [?]

Comments (0)

Tags: ,

‘Grey’s Anatomy:’ A healthy obsession

Posted on 28 February 2007 by Sarah Finneran

McDreamy, McSteamy and Meredith. Name that show. A guaranteed 90 percent of the world’s population could answer correctly. It is the television sitcom that’s sweeping the nation. In its third season, “Grey’s Anatomy” has accumulated quite a fanbase, including a large majority of the Marquette campus.

The show centers on Dr. Meredith Grey. Within the first season, Meredith forms camaraderie with four other interns and falls in love with her resident, Dr. Derek Shepherd, fondly dubbed “McDreamy.” The show follows the trials and tribulations Meredith is forced to endure, both in her personal and professional life. Other characters include the ice queen Christina Yang, the lovable George O’Malley and the emotionally involved Izzie Stevens.

From its debut almost three years ago, “Grey’s Anatomy” has experienced widespread popularity. The dark humor and sarcasm serve as a perfect counterpart for the medical trauma that takes precedence throughout the show. The element of love in the workplace only adds to the suspenseful plotline, especially with Yang and surgeon Dr. Burke’s recent engagement and the blossoming relationship between intern Alex and Addison, Shepherd’s ex-wife. The entangled love subplot may leave a newcomer to the show a bit bewildered; however, it is well worth the effort to understand in order to become a faithful Grey’s follower.

“Grey’s Anatomy” has been incredibly well-received on the Marquette campus, to put it mildly. “I sacrificed ’The OC’ for ’Grey’s.’ As a latecomer to the show, I was a little worried that everyone had hyped the show up too much. However, mid-way through second season, I was hooked,” said Sara Burnworth, a freshman in the College of Arts and Sciences. One risks the imminent threat of death if the mistake is ever made of walking into a room anytime between 8 and 9 p.m. on Thursday evenings. Where two or three are gathered, riveted to the television in complete silence, “Grey’s Anatomy” is undoubtedly the focus.

It seems the show takes precedence over most other activities on campus, whether it is a club meeting or the English paper due at 10 a.m. the next morning. “Despite the fact that working on Thursdays would be much more convenient for me, I refuse to work, or do anything else for that matter, on Thursday nights. It’s the price you pay,” said Micaela Robb-McGrath, a freshman in the College of Communication. It be difficult being the fan of a hit television show. It takes time and dedication. No one said it would be easy.

Popularity: 14% [?]

Comments (0)

Tags: ,

Another one jumps the shark

Posted on 13 February 2007 by Kyle Shamorian

It’s the oldest story in the book: Show meets audience. Audience likes show. Show finds success. Show becomes complacent and panders to audience. Audience leaves show.

Let’s be honest: We’ve all had our hearts broken once or twice by network television. We jump on the bandwagon of pop culture’s finest, foster a relationship and establish trust. We tune in each week and follow the story line religiously. We dedicate get-togethers for the sole purpose of its viewing and MySpace the actors on the show.

But once our weekly favorite reaches its pinnacle of success, something happens. It becomes everything we never wanted. It becomes unrealistic and mutates into food for the masses, deviating from its original concept. Some of us are still getting over the heartbreak of the later “Dawson’s Creek” episodes, and we shed a single tear when “Saved by the Bell: The College Years” finds its way on to basic cable.

This time, though, the networks have gone too far. ABC’s “Lost” is one of many on the long list of shows that have lost its charm. The show’s painful erosion mocks its pre-mainstream suspense and in-depth character development, leaving its audience bored and jaded. And with new episodes beginning Feb. 7, we can only hope our three-month separation sufficed to let old wounds heal.

So what happened to “Lost’s” desert island magic and vicarious adventure that caused the show to jump the shark? – the phrase referring to the episode of “Happy Days” when Fonzie water skis over a shark wearing his leather jacket, marking a decline in the show’s believability.

Let’s rehash the past…

A plane crashes. The survivors, who at first seem as strangers to their fellow castaways, are secretly connected by a subplot of arbitrary happenstance. Each episode directs focus to a string of flashbacks that provide insight into each character’s morally questionable and tumultuous past – not to mention a few closeted skeletons that undoubtedly get outed in later episodes.

There are “the others” who seem to kidnap secondary characters at will, or at least for an interesting plot twist. A smoke monster wreaks havoc on the island; there are character hallucinations, secret hatches, drug addictions, and every once in a while, polar bear attacks during sweeps week.

It seems like an interesting show, right? It was, or at least while we harbored the assumption that “Lost’s” many questions would be answered. But they never were. Since the end of the first season, “Lost” fans have been left completely unsatisfied with redundant flashbacks, forced real-time plot, and questions answered with more difficult questions.

Despite huge budgets, network support and three years to compose relevant rising action, writers have left America with the slimmest of pickings for sustenance in an otherwise barren wasteland of network television.

Let’s take a look at a few of the characters:

Jack Shephard is our troubled protagonist. Shephard’s heart of gold and can-do attitude renders him ripe for the leadership role. His rugged doctor look aligns nicely with his subtle but consistent beard stubble that fails to develop into full-on facial hair, despite the 40 days he’s spent on an island. Short of Norelco product placement, there’s just no other way to explain it.

Hugo “Hurley” Reyes is the show’s comic relief. Before the crash, the overweight Hurley ironically won the lottery and quit his job at the local fast-food joint. Now obesity is no laughing matter, but there is something off-putting about a character who maintains his husky physique after a month plus diet of coconut milk, raw fish and running from mythical creatures.

Kate Austen is our desert island heroine and the uppermost tip of the Jack-Kate-Sawyer love triangle. Her past hints at crime, legal mishaps and violent relationships. Every show needs a good back and forth love story – “The Creek,” for example, wrote the book on the “will-she-won’t-she” plot line – but finding Mr. Right seems a lesser priority when avoiding death becomes part of one’s daily ritual.

Charlie Pace remains outside the circle of Lost’s central story, but is one of the four members of Driveshaft – a fictional band of international acclaim. Despite being an unlikely love interest of one of the hotter hotties in the cast as well as kicking a heroin addiction a little too easily to believe, his musical flashbacks reveal a band that wouldn’t make it on MTV at 3:00 a.m.

The second and third seasons pale in comparison to season one. As the series progresses, each episode becomes less believable than the one before it. As we last left the show, “the others” had captured Kate and Sawyer and forced them into back-breaking labor. When Kate finds a way to escape, she forgoes the opportunity in order to sleep with Sawyer – the show’s sharp-tongued, yet handsome troublemaker. Lost has charged its audience with a suspension of disbelief so intense, that escaping torture seems a lesser priority than a romp in the hay with a main character. This stunt alone sinks the show to the level of a certain “Happy Days” episode.

It’s not as if the writers are incapable of interesting ideas and a progressing plot line. Season one did just that. They’re simply too afraid to reveal anything of importance for fear that they’d give away too much and have nowhere to go. The result, however, is redundancy, useless information and a fading number of viewers.

The show’s development is sad, really. Each new episode bears more and more a resemblance to your high school prom. Every Wednesday we get dressed up for a night of dancing and fun, but are left with nothing more than overcooked chicken and that sinking suspicion that we’ve been used.

Popularity: 14% [?]

Comments (0)

Tags: ,

‘Office’ craze across Marquette campus

Posted on 06 December 2006 by Sarah Finneran

“I told Dwight that there is honor in losing. Which, as we all know, is completely ridiculous. But there is, however, honor in making a loser feel better, which is what I just did for Dwight. Would I rather be feared or loved? Easy: both. I want people to be afraid of how much they love me.” Continue Reading

Popularity: 14% [?]

Comments (0)

Tags: ,

Sex and the City: A Male’s Perspective

Posted on 16 February 2006 by Kyle Shamorian

Sex and the City: Most women like it, and most men hate it. Needless to say, the show is a focal point of gender conflict, and with the recent release of the show’s full sixth season on DVD, Sex and the City is more popular than ever.

Continue Reading

Popularity: 4% [?]

Comments (0)

Advertise Here


Photos from our Flickr stream

See all photos

The Warrior: Marquette's Independent News Source on Facebook
Advertise Here